One of the principal arguments against paedocommunion, the admission of baptized children to the Lord’s Table, is that children cannot adequately examine themselves. The argument usually rests on Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 11:28–29: “Let a person examine himself; in this way let him eat the bread and drink from the cup. For whoever eats and drinks without recognizing the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.” These verses are important, but they must be interpreted within Paul’s argument. Paul is not answering the question, “At what age may a covenant child first receive Communion?” He is correcting a particular scandal in the Corinthian church. Nothing in the passage says that children must be excluded from the Table.
The Problem in Corinth
Paul begins his correction in verse 17: “Now in giving this instruction I do not praise you, since you come together not for the better but for the worse.” Paul is rebuking a congregation whose gatherings are doing more harm than good, and he immediately identifies the problem as divisions among them. When the Corinthians assemble, their behavior contradicts the very meaning of the Lord’s Supper. Some eat their own food without waiting for others. One person remains hungry while another becomes drunk, and those with abundance humiliate those who have nothing.
The Corinthians have turned the Supper, which should express the unity of Christ’s body, into an occasion for selfishness, division, gluttony, and humiliation. This is why Paul asks, “Do you despise the church of God?” The church, the gathered body, is at the center of his concern.
Paul then reminds them of what he received from the Lord. Jesus took the bread and declared it to be his body, given for his people. He took the cup and identified it with the new covenant in his blood. Whenever the church eats this bread and drinks this cup, it proclaims the Lord’s death until he comes. It is against this background that Paul warns, “Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sin against the body and blood of the Lord.”
Paul’s warning concerns their manner of eating. It was unworthy because it contradicted what the Supper proclaimed. They professed to be one body while treating one another as divided classes. Imagine a father coming home to find that his children have left the house in complete disorder and ignored everything he told them to do. He asks, “What are you doing?” The children stand before him knowing that they are being chastised. Paul addresses the Corinthians with something like that fatherly severity. They know what the Supper is supposed to be, yet their conduct openly profanes it.
What Does Self-Examination Mean?
Paul’s command must be read against that background: “Let a person examine himself; in this way let him eat the bread and drink from the cup.” Self-examination is often treated as a private search for every remaining sin in one’s heart. In context, Paul’s immediate concern is the Corinthians’ treatment of the assembled body. They need to examine how they are approaching the meal. Are they recognizing the church as one body? Are they waiting for one another? Are they sharing the meal in fellowship and unity? Or are they eating selfishly, humiliating the poor, and behaving as though the other members do not matter?
Paul’s wording moves from examination to participation: “Let a person examine himself; in this way let him eat.” The examination serves proper participation in the covenant meal. This also helps explain Paul’s warning about eating and drinking “without recognizing the body.” In context, the Corinthians have failed to recognize the body gathered around them. Some feast while others go hungry, and their behavior denies the unity that the Supper signifies.
The Supper also bears an essential relationship to Christ’s physical body. Paul has just repeated Christ’s words, “This is my body.” The immediate problem concerns the church as Christ’s body. Earlier, Paul wrote that because there is one bread, “we who are many are one body” (1 Cor. 10:17). The Corinthians’ sin is especially serious because they are sinning against both the meal Christ instituted and the people united to him.
Paul says that this abuse explains why some among the Corinthians are weak or sick and why some have “fallen asleep.” The severity resembles other instances of divine judgment within the covenant community, such as the judgment of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5. Paul distinguishes the Lord’s discipline of his people from the world’s condemnation: “When we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined, so that we may not be condemned with the world.” The Corinthians remain members of the covenant community under the Lord’s discipline. His judgment calls them to repentance so that they will not share in the world’s condemnation.
Paul then concludes, “Therefore, my brothers and sisters, when you come together to eat, wait for one another. If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you gather together you will not come under judgment.” The “therefore” is important because it introduces the practical conclusion drawn from Paul’s preceding argument. His instruction is to “wait for one another.” They must come together and eat as one body. Anyone who is merely hungry should eat at home rather than turning the Lord’s Supper into an occasion for satisfying his appetite. The Corinthians must stop treating a communal covenant meal as a collection of private suppers.
This conclusion shows how Paul’s commands concerning self-examination and discerning the body function in his argument. The Corinthians are to examine themselves precisely because they have failed to recognize and treat the church as one body. If “the body” in verse 29 refers primarily to Christ’s body, the reading offered here still holds. Their failure to discern Christ’s body is demonstrated in the way they profane the meal he instituted, sharing in it selfishly through gluttony and drunkenness while others are left hungry instead of receiving it as a communion of the one body gathered together.
Can a Local Problem Establish a Universal Rule?
A situational command can certainly have continuing application. If another church divides itself at the Table, humiliates its poorer members, or turns the Supper into an occasion for selfish indulgence, Paul’s warning applies directly. The universal principle concerns how the covenant community must share the meal: in unity, love, and recognition of Christ’s body. Paul gives no minimum age or intellectual threshold for admission.
That additional conclusion must be demonstrated rather than assumed. Paul never raises the question of children in this passage, much less excludes them because of their developmental limitations. Children who grow in understanding must certainly learn to examine their conduct. If, as they mature, they begin to despise the church, profane the Supper, or refuse to recognize the body, Paul’s warning applies to them just as it applies to adults. Their need to mature in self-examination does not establish an adult capacity for introspection as a prerequisite for the covenant meal.
Remembering Christ, proclaiming his death, and examining oneself all assume personal understanding, which develops through covenant nurture. Children are present within the apostolic churches. Paul directly addresses them in Ephesians 6:1 and Colossians 3:20, treating them as present members of the congregations hearing his letters. They are to be raised in the discipline and instruction of the Lord, learning what covenant faithfulness means as they grow.
The Lord’s Supper can be part of that formation. Children learn the meaning of the meal as they participate under the instruction of their parents and the church. Participation and instruction need not be separated, as though children must first master the doctrine of the Supper before they may experience its formative significance. The pattern has roots in the Old Covenant, where children were raised within the covenant life of Israel and taught the meaning of its redemptive rites. The Passover instructions themselves anticipate children asking, “What does this ceremony mean to you?” (Exod. 12:26), with parents then explaining the Lord’s deliverance of his people from Egypt. Understanding developed within covenant nurture as children learned the meaning of God’s saving acts through the worship and practices of the covenant community. Paedocommunion follows this same principle: the covenant community receives its children and nurtures them toward mature understanding within the life and worship of God’s people.
What Does 1 Corinthians 11 Actually Establish?
The abuses in Corinth may not exhaust everything that can be learned from 1 Corinthians 11. Any broader doctrine must arise from Paul’s actual argument. The passage teaches that the Supper must be received reverently. It teaches self-examination, recognition of the body, remembrance of Christ, proclamation of his death, and unity within the church. It also warns that profaning the meal can bring serious covenant discipline.
The passage never bars baptized children from the Table until they can perform a particular kind of introspective examination. First Corinthians 11 has much to teach us about who should come to the Table and how they should come. Quoting the words “examine himself,” however, does not by itself establish an age or intellectual threshold that Paul never mentions. If baptized covenant children are to be excluded from the Supper on that basis, the exclusion must be demonstrated rather than assumed. Paul is correcting members of the Corinthian church who were selfishly dividing the church’s meal, and the conclusion he draws from that correction is remarkably concrete: “When you come together to eat, wait for one another.”
— Romans 11:36
Leave a comment